Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] x86, kaslr: Use init_size instead of run_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 12:00:34AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> commit e6023367d779 ("x86, kaslr: Prevent .bss from overlaping initrd")
> 
> introduced one run_size for kaslr.
> 
> We do not need to have home grown run_size.
> 
> We should use real runtime size (include copy/decompress) aka init_size

Why?

I can see why but you need to explain it here. Also, look at the
e6023367d779 commit message. Now this is how you do a commit message!
Especially if it is early boot code, you explain stuff. Junjie even went
the distance and did a nice graphic.

So please redo your commit message.

And saying it is trivial and obvious will not get you anywhere, as
you've noticed already.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux