On Wed, 25 Feb, at 11:31:32AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Feb, at 07:43:48PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/boot/header.S > > > =================================================================== > > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/boot/header.S > > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/boot/header.S > > > @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ _start: > > > # Part 2 of the header, from the old setup.S > > > > > > .ascii "HdrS" # header signature > > > - .word 0x020d # header version number (>= 0x0105) > > > + .word 0x020e # header version number (>= 0x0105) > > > # or else old loadlin-1.5 will fail) > > > .globl realmode_swtch > > > realmode_swtch: .word 0, 0 # default_switch, SETUPSEG > > > @@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ pref_address: .quad LOAD_PHYSICAL_ADDR > > > #endif > > > init_size: .long INIT_SIZE # kernel initialization size > > > handover_offset: .long 0 # Filled in by build.c > > > +ext_code32_start: .long 0 # werid one! > > > > How about a comment like, "# Upper 32-bits of code32_start" ? > > Also, in the Linux kernel we should not go about inventing > new English words like 'werid', right? Yeah, my intention is to replace "werid one" with the comment I suggested above. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
