On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:40:11PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:01:06PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > When remapping the UEFI memory map using ioremap_cache(), we > > have to deal with potential failure. Note that, even if the > > common case is for ioremap_cache() to return the existing linear > > mapping of the memory map, we cannot rely on that to be always the > > case, e.g., in the presence of a mem= kernel parameter. > > > > At the same time, remove a stale comment and move the memmap code > > together. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > > This should probably be picked up before my mem= patch, which I will be > resending shortly. I'll mention that when posting. > > I guess Catalin should pick this up given the other portions are in the > arm64 tree, and this falls under arch/arm64. I picked both up. Thanks. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
