On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:45:27PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 13:03 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > Yeah, I was struggling a bit with that. I think the agreement was that > > everything EFI related goes through Matt's tree, but I don't think > > that necessarily makes sense for patches that only touch arch/arm64, > > unless there are interdependencies with the generic code. > > > > From this series, only patches #7 and #8 need to go through Matt's > > tree, and even if #9 and #10 are also related to SMBIOS, they are in > > fact orthogonal to #7 and #8, so those can still go through the arm64 > > tree without any merge order issues later on. > > > > @Matt: any thoughts? > > In this case, if it makes things easier for you folks in terms of > dependencies to take this *all* through the arm64 tree, that seems > sensible to me. Thanks, Matt. I won't merge anything that touches files outside of arch/arm64 without your ack, but then I'll be happy to take this lot via the arm64 tree. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
