On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 02:39:40PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> For UEFI, we need to install the memory mappings used for Runtime Services
> in a dedicated set of page tables. Add create_pgd_mapping(), which allows
> us to allocate and install those page table entries early.
> This also adds a 'map_xn' option, that creates regions with the PXN and
> UXN bits set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Ard,
Some comments below...
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h
> index c2f006c48bdb..bcf166043a8b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h
> @@ -33,5 +33,8 @@ extern void __iomem *early_io_map(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long virt);
> extern void init_mem_pgprot(void);
> /* create an identity mapping for memory (or io if map_io is true) */
> extern void create_id_mapping(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t size, int map_io);
> +extern void create_pgd_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, phys_addr_t phys,
> + unsigned long virt, phys_addr_t size,
> + int map_io, int map_xn);
I really don't like these map_io and map_xn parameters.
Further down we have logic "if (map_io)...", which is out of place, and
doesn't match the normal style of mapping page table entries.
Could we not instead have something like:
extern void create_pgd_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, phys_addr_t phys,
unsigned long virt, phys_addr_t size,
pgprot_t prot_sect, pgprot_t prot_pte);
Then we can remove all the conditional logic for map_io, map_xn?
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 7eaa6a8c8467..f7d17a5a1f56 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static void __init alloc_init_pte(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>
> static void __init alloc_init_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> - phys_addr_t phys, int map_io)
> + phys_addr_t phys, int map_io, int map_xn)
> {
> pmd_t *pmd;
> unsigned long next;
> @@ -167,6 +167,9 @@ static void __init alloc_init_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud,
> if (map_io) {
> prot_sect = PROT_SECT_DEVICE_nGnRE;
> prot_pte = __pgprot(PROT_DEVICE_nGnRE);
> + } else if (map_xn) {
> + prot_sect = PROT_SECT_NORMAL;
> + prot_pte = PAGE_KERNEL;
> } else {
> prot_sect = PROT_SECT_NORMAL_EXEC;
> prot_pte = PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC;
Ideally, this if block should be completely removed.
> @@ -203,7 +206,7 @@ static void __init alloc_init_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud,
>
> static void __init alloc_init_pud(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> - unsigned long phys, int map_io)
> + unsigned long phys, int map_io, int map_xn)
> {
> pud_t *pud;
> unsigned long next;
> @@ -221,7 +224,7 @@ static void __init alloc_init_pud(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
> /*
> * For 4K granule only, attempt to put down a 1GB block
> */
> - if (!map_io && (PAGE_SHIFT == 12) &&
> + if (!map_io && !map_xn && (PAGE_SHIFT == 12) &&
Presumably the !map_io and !map_xn tests are here because of the
PROT_SECT_NORMAL_EXEC below? Is there another reason why a pud mapping
would be unsuitable for these?
> ((addr | next | phys) & ~PUD_MASK) == 0) {
> pud_t old_pud = *pud;
> set_pud(pud, __pud(phys | PROT_SECT_NORMAL_EXEC));
> @@ -239,7 +242,8 @@ static void __init alloc_init_pud(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
> flush_tlb_all();
> }
> } else {
> - alloc_init_pmd(mm, pud, addr, next, phys, map_io);
> + alloc_init_pmd(mm, pud, addr, next, phys, map_io,
> + map_xn);
> }
> phys += next - addr;
> } while (pud++, addr = next, addr != end);
> @@ -251,7 +255,7 @@ static void __init alloc_init_pud(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
> */
> static void __init __create_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
> phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long virt,
> - phys_addr_t size, int map_io)
> + phys_addr_t size, int map_io, int map_xn)
> {
> unsigned long addr, length, end, next;
>
> @@ -261,7 +265,7 @@ static void __init __create_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd,
> end = addr + length;
> do {
> next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
> - alloc_init_pud(mm, pgd, addr, next, phys, map_io);
> + alloc_init_pud(mm, pgd, addr, next, phys, map_io, map_xn);
> phys += next - addr;
> } while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
> }
> @@ -275,7 +279,7 @@ static void __init create_mapping(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long virt,
> return;
> }
> __create_mapping(&init_mm, pgd_offset_k(virt & PAGE_MASK), phys, virt,
> - size, 0);
> + size, 0, 0);
> }
>
> void __init create_id_mapping(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t size, int map_io)
> @@ -285,7 +289,15 @@ void __init create_id_mapping(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t size, int map_io)
> return;
> }
> __create_mapping(&init_mm, &idmap_pg_dir[pgd_index(addr)],
> - addr, addr, size, map_io);
> + addr, addr, size, map_io, 0);
> +}
> +
> +void __init create_pgd_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, phys_addr_t phys,
> + unsigned long virt, phys_addr_t size,
> + int map_io, int map_xn)
> +{
> + __create_mapping(mm, pgd_offset(mm, virt), phys, virt, size, map_io,
> + map_xn);
> }
>
> static void __init map_mem(void)
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
Cheers,
--
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
