On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:39:38PM +0100, Jon Masters wrote: > On 08/20/2014 01:35 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > >> On Thu, 14 Aug, at 12:32:05PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:59:04AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >>>> If we cannot relocate the kernel Image to its preferred offset of base of DRAM > >>>> plus TEXT_OFFSET, instead relocate it to the lowest available 2 MB boundary plus > >>>> TEXT_OFFSET. We may lose a bit of memory at the low end, but we can still > >>>> proceed normally otherwise. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Acked-by: Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Ard, who's picking this up? > > > > Will's already taken this into arm64/devel [1,2] with the intention of > > waiting for v3.18 [3]. Per Leif's comment [4] that might have to be > > bumped. > > So what's the plan with this series? Waiting for 3.18? The problem is > that this patch series needs to be pulled for any platform with an EFI > firmware located at DRAM base (e.g. AMD Seattle) as was noted before. Yes, it's queued for 3.18 and should be in linux-next too. This isn't a regression, so you'll just have to sit tight. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html