On 20 August 2014 19:35, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Aug, at 12:32:05PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:59:04AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> > > If we cannot relocate the kernel Image to its preferred offset of base of DRAM >> > > plus TEXT_OFFSET, instead relocate it to the lowest available 2 MB boundary plus >> > > TEXT_OFFSET. We may lose a bit of memory at the low end, but we can still >> > > proceed normally otherwise. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Acked-by: Mark Salter <msalter@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> >> >> Ard, who's picking this up? > Hey Matt, These patches mostly touch non-EFI specific files under arch/arm64, so to prevent conflicts, it makes sense for the arm64 tree to take them. arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c | 18 ++++++------------ arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 6 +++--- arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) -- Ard. > Will's already taken this into arm64/devel [1,2] with the intention of > waiting for v3.18 [3]. Per Leif's comment [4] that might have to be > bumped. > > Will? > > Mark. > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?h=devel > [2] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?h=devel&id=12f002aa8d96b90e6e37cc2b0d9a6a3cacdf8ef5 > [3] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-August/279655.html > [4] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-August/279771.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
