On Wed, 06 Aug, at 04:10:45PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Shouldn't we clear the bit here if we failed to enable runtime > services for some reason? Other code may test the bit assuming that it > signifies that runtime services have been enabled successfully, while > this patch changes it to mean that we /intended/ to enable them, which > is not quite the same thing. Yep, good catch. We need to do something similar for efi_runtime_init() on x86 too. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
