On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:20:46PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 29 July 2014 11:15:45 Mark Salter wrote: > > > - > > > - __flush_dcache_area(release_addr, sizeof(release_addr[0])); > > > + writeq_relaxed(__pa(secondary_holding_pen), release_addr); > > > + __flush_dcache_area(release_addr, sizeof(*release_addr)); > > > > __flush_dcache_area((__force void *)release_addr, ... > > > > to avoid sparse warning. Presumably we'd get this for the write_relaxed too? > > > > I think it would be cleaner to drop the __iomem annotation and use vmap() > rather than ioremap(). That requires having a 'struct page' though, which > I'm not sure you have. As far as I am aware, we'd only have a struct page for memory falling in the linear map, so for the cases this patch is actually required we wouldn't have a struct page. So it looks like I should just make release_addr a void __iomem *. Then this line can just be: __flush_dcache_area(release_addr, 8); Where we could replace 8 with sizeof(u64), sizeof(__le64), etc if 8 is too magic. How does that sound? Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html