On Tue, 08 Jul, at 11:45:03AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Well, that is what is says in the comment: > * ops.get_next_variable() is only called from register_efivars() > * or efivar_update_sysfs_entries(), > * which is protected by the BKL, so that path is safe. Oops, so it does. That's a stale comment. I'll update it. > I agree. So shall I update my patch to add a single spin_lock that is > used by all wrappers? > We will likely need the wrappers on ARM as well, only ia64 needs > another approach (if desired) Please do, that would be great! -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
