On Tue, 29 Apr, at 02:47:28PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Waiting for the tip/x86/efi to be merged first is not a problem. We > also need a stable base for testing the arm64 UEFI series, so I assume > this series can be based onto tip/x86/efi (would such branch be rebased > before hitting mainline?). tip/x86/efi is unlikely to be rebased. Certainly with dependencies like this there would have to be a really good reason to rebase it. > Given that Leif's series contains both generic efi and arm64 patches, > what's your preference for merging them? I'm happy to add my ack and > they go via your tree (or the other way around). I'm happy either way, though if I take them through my tree (and subsequently through tip) you won't have to worry about the merge window rigmarole, which is a plus. So, eveyone happy for me to take these with Catalin's Acked-by? -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
