On Tue, 25 Mar, at 03:40:30PM, Roy Franz wrote: > Add the efi_early_call() macro to invoke functions in the efi_early > structure. Using a macro for these invocations allows the arm32/arm64 > architectures to define the macro differently so that they can directly > invoke the boot services functions that are exposed in the efi_early > structure on x86. Prior to the introduction of the efi_early structure > the efi_call_physN macros were used on all architectures and allowed > for this differentiation. > > Signed-off-by: Roy Franz <roy.franz@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 5 +++++ > drivers/firmware/efi/efi-stub-helper.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) Confused. Why have you rewritten the patch that I sent Satuday morning? https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/22/61 I don't think your version goes far enough because you've left all the efi_early->call() stuff in eboot.c. So now there's two ways to invoke EFI functions in the x86 boot stub. What's wrong with the patch that I sent? -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
