RE: [PATCH 1/1] efi: cper: Support different length of Error Section

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gentle ping, Tony. Any comments about this patch? 

-- Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Huang12
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 11:59 AM
> To: Tony Luck
> Cc: Adrian Huang12; Matt Fleming; matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx; linux-
> efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] efi: cper: Support different length of Error
> Section
> 
> On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 16:38 -0800, Tony Luck wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > >> Tested on v3.14-rc5 with Grantley platform and Intel RAStool.
> >
> > So - I've been playing with Grantley too - and didn't see these warnings
> about
> > "error length section too small".  I suspect this is because I've been
> > toggling the
> > BIOS option under:
> >
> >    EDKII > Advanced > System Event Log > WHEA Settings > UEFI Version
> >
> > to request reports according to spec version 2.3.1 (to get the card handle
> and
> > module handle fields)
> Yes. This is the correct behavior because the size of struct
> cper_sec_mem_err (drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c) and the error_data_length
> field of struct acpi_generic_data are (80-byte memory error section).
> 
> For those BIOSes only support the UEFI spec versions which are less than
> 2.3, the error_data_length field of struct acpi_generic_data is 73
> (73-byte memory error section) according to spec version 2.2, 2.1 and so
> on. We will see the warning message after injecting a memory corrected
> error.
> 
> > Does that fit with your experience too?
> Yes.
> 
> >
> > -Tony
> >
> > [I note that there is a 2.4 version of UEFI ... are there more changes to
> the
> > error record format there?  I know there are plans to tweak even more
> > bits because
> > some of the 2-byte fields in the memory error description are not big
> enough
> > to describe locations on 64GB DIMMs]
> I just checked version 2.4 and 2.4 Errata A. The size of memory error
> section is still 80 bytes. The only difference is that the field
> "Extended" in spec 2.4 Errata A replaces the field "reserved" in spec
> 2.4. This should be changed accordingly.
> 
> If there are more added fileds to error record format in the newer UEFI
> spec, we can simply modify proc_generic_section_len, mem_section_len and
> pcie_section_len to support different length of error section. The
> definition of mem_section_len is an example to support both 73-byte and
> 80-byte memory error section.

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����*jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux