On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:50 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Since the fix is so obvious, and you don't want to post using your real > name, I'm going to assume that you're just trolling and not actually > attempt to answer you directly. Maybe the fix is obvious to you but it clearly isn't to a lot of other people. As far as your assumption I'm here "trolling", you may want to rethink that. How you could even interpret my post as trolling in the first place is laughable but I'm neither a stranger to this mailing list, nor am I new here. A simple search would tell you that but making bad assumptions seems to be your preference. You would also discover my name is Derek. And now knowing it, do you feel better? There are far more worthy things to concern yourself with but that's merely my opinion. I'll ignore the fact that your reply offered absolutely no value to the thread and issue at hand but for future reference, please leave such useless comments to direct email and off of the mailing list. Furthermore, since you're unwilling to help with your "obvious fix", my recommendation to the many others having this problems is what was suggested to me... Revert to an older v4l or use the tree located at: http://linuxtv.org/hg/~endriss/v4l-dvb/ Thanks only to those with something useless or constructive to say. _______________________________________________ linux-dvb users mailing list For V4L/DVB development, please use instead linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
