Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 25.12.2008, 10:44 +0100 schrieb Helmut Auer:
> Hello Udo
> > After some insights to S2API interface, this looks even better to me:
> >
> > properties.num = 1;
> > properties.props[0].cmd = DTV_DELIVERY_SYSTEM;
> > properties.props[0].u.data = SYS_DVBS2;
> > if (ioctl(d, FE_CAP_SET_PROPERTY, &properties) >= 0) {
> > // has S2 capability
> > }
> >
> > A generic frontend test function that delivers the necessary S2
> > capability information, and many other capabilities too. And there are a
> > lot more delivery systems that seem to be hard to detect, so a query
> > function 'can do SYS_XXXX' seems necessary anyway.
> >
> >
> >
> That's a good approach, but I doubt that anyone takes care of it.
> This mailing list is like WOM (Write only Memory) when you post patches
> or make suggestions :(
>
if I get the status right for this one, we have from Klaus a fully
qualified patch according to README.patches.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-dvb/msg30371.html
Further we have at least an ACK from Steven and no NACK so far.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-dvb/msg30817.html
But that ACK also means that he will not forward it himself to Mauro
through one of his development repositories by a pull request.
This would cause a signed-off-by from him being in the commit chain.
In this case direct mail to Mauro is requested to let him know a patch
on the list is considered to be ready, or wait until he gets aware of
it.
Igor has added some more S2 capable devices, IIRC.
Cheers,
Hermann
_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
