As attached, tested yesterday evening with scan from Ubuntu dvb-utils
1.1.1-3.
I see fec values in nl-Randstad and nl-AlphenaandenRijn that aren't valid
(anymore) compared to the information source I have. Should I send those
in with my 'theoretical' fixes or should I wait until I can try them (or
ask people to try them).
Koos van den Hout
--
Koos van den Hout Homepage: http://idefix.net/~koos/
PGP keyid DSS/1024 0xF0D7C263 or RSA/1024 0xCA845CB5
Webprojects: Camp Wireless http://www.camp-wireless.org/
The Virtual Bookcase http://www.virtualbookcase.com/
# Digitenne (Utrecht, The Netherlands) # Transmitters: # Utrecht, Maarssen, Lopik, Amersfoort # Source of channels/info: http://www.radio.nl/fmtv # # by Koos van den Hout <koos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # T freq bw fec_hi fec_lo mod transmission-mode guard-interval hierarchy T 706000000 8MHz 1/2 NONE QAM64 8k 1/4 NONE # UHF 50 T 818000000 8MHz 1/2 NONE QAM64 8k 1/4 NONE # UHF 64 T 762000000 8MHz 2/3 NONE QAM64 8k 1/4 NONE # UHF 57 T 498000000 8MHz 2/3 NONE QAM64 8k 1/4 NONE # UHF 24
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
