On 24.11.2008 17:14, Niels Wagenaar wrote: > Op Ma, 24 november, 2008 16:59, schreef VDR User: >> If the multiproto method is superior, which it certainly seems to be, >> why can't that method be adopted into s2api? It seems silly that this >> problem hasn't been addressed in the conception of s2api. >> > > Is multiproto superior? Perhaps on several points it's indeed better or > more complete. But then again, it was allready 2 years in development so > it's bound to have additional enhancements which S2API doesn't have atm. > > But then again, we're comparing multiproto with S2API which was build from > the ground in just little over 3 months. So yeah, it doesn't have it all. > >>From my personal POV. I think S2API isn't missing something concerning > tuning. The latest VDR 1.7.0 patch (which I made available on 7-10), still > works in my configuration. And I heard from several others that it works > for them also. Even after updating the v4l repo to the latest editions. So > DVB tuning works with S2API. > > So, what we're missing are enhancements! Well, we can add that since it's > OpenSource and all. So add it allready instead of complaining ;) Well, I did - but apparently nobody cares... :-( Klaus _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
