Markus. Maybe it's worth to note that I've wasted nice Saturday evening in order to find this trivial modification, after you refused to help in solving this annoying issue. I'm sorry. If you need an authorship attribution let's be fair. The patch resulted from your repos diffing because you simply wanted em28xx driver to remain 'inferior' in the mainline kernel. It's also worth to note that mainline driver works fine. No audio problems, oopses, etc. Cheers, W. 2008/11/8 Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Markus Rechberger wrote: >> >>> Should I start picking patches from the linuxtv.org tree where patches >>> from my tree are taken >>> and where the Sign off is not provided? >> >> SOB's are just meant to testify that the code is GPL. It has nothing to do >> with authorship. >> >> On all cases I'm aware, when some code from your tree were merged upstream, >> your authorship were marked inside the patch's description. Also, your >> authorship are explicit at the em28xx files you've contributed. >> > > really? > http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/5f3c3af9c1f9 > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.dvb/44726 > > nevermind. > > Markus > -- Talkers are no good doers. http://greblus.net/djangoblog/ _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
