Andreas Oberritter wrote: > Steven Toth wrote: >> I don't agree to blindly massaging the demod values and trying to add a >> fake user facing API is a real solution. > > I wonder what you're referring to with this sentence. I think trying to massage various mysterious and unknown demod statistics into something that we can barely understand, in order to get them exposed in either a single unit of measure, or multiple units of measure, isn't a credible solution. We should go back and find the correct SNR mechanism for each demod. Then review and agree on an internal kernel spec, and re-engineer the demods to meet the spec. Devin has started the ball rolling nicely, to allow this to happen. - Steve _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
