Markus Rechberger wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 12:51 PM, barry bouwsma > <free_beer_for_all@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> --- On Sun, 9/14/08, Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>>>> (Also to be noted is that, some BSD chaps also have shown interest in >> Does BSD == NetBSD here? Or are there other developments >> as well that I'm not aware of? >> > > for now it's netBSD, we're offering support to everyone who's interested. > > >>> As for the em28xx driver I agreed with pushing all my code >> Do you want to have patches for your repository, like the >> following (just an example, based on the NetBSD SOC source) >> > > If you look at the chipdrivers, manufacturers often have independent > code there, as code can be kept independent in that area. > The bridge driver will contain operating system dependent code of course, > The drx driver which you mention mostly uses the Code which came from > Micronas, the module interface code which you looked at is linux > specific yes, but it's more or less just a wrapper against the > original source. It's the same with upcoming drivers. xc5000 and mxl5005 drivers are good examples of this. Basically reference code with a DVB wrapper and whitespace + context passing changes. - Steve _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
