ChaosMedia > WebDev wrote: > It's not my place to judge if the problem is moving in the right > direction or not but it's a good thing that something happens. > I'll trust the experienced devs whom acked this proposal. Thank you, it was time to take a position and it's good to see many people supporting us now. > > Writting a multiproto patch for kaffeine to get dvb-s2 support, got me > to learn a bit about v4l-dvb api and multiproto. Again i'm no > experienced coder, i followed some examples to keep v4l-dvb backward > compatibility and it wasn't really a walk in the park nor was it really > necessary now that i look at it, either your use multiproto or you don't > and if you do, patch your app and build it again. > But well it's working and that's what was most important to me, to get > it working "asap". Agreed. > > So as Christophe Thommeret wrote, who helped a lot dealing with > kaffeine, i'll support whichever api is going to bring dvb-s2 and new > dvb hardware support to the kernel. Agreed. > > In the meantime i'll keep using and maintaining my multiproto patch as > it's curently done with most other applications, so end users don't have > to wait for the whole kernel thing to get completed. Great, please do. > > And of course if or when the new api has to be tested and modifications > to be done on the application side, i'll join the effort. Great, thanks. > > Marc. > > Acked-by: Marc Delcambre <webdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Steve _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
