> Talking about the patch from dominik: is it normal that the registers > settings are different than those from TT-3200 (in budget-ci.c)? I mean > it is the same chips (stb0899/stb6100), so is it possible to use those > settings directly with a TT 3200; I have reception problems for some > transponders, and a lot of other users also, so if those settings are > OK to try I guess that's something I am ready to do to improve things. > Also I saw that the patch touches stb0899/6100 files in the frontends > dir, so my question: are these changes there to improve tuning also or > just related to the support of the other cards? > Thx > Bye > Manu I have test this week the locking of my tt3650ci with the hg from the end of last wheek (7215) plus pctv452e-patch. I cant see any locking problems but I have a very simple configuration (only one satelite: ASTRA 19,2°E, most channels on horizontal high-band). Why the pctv452e-module use different settings for STB0899 and STB6100 I dont know, sorry. When I compare the actual driver with the driver I have used the last months (version from february) I think the locking is much faster. *But back to the problem in the headline:* When anyone have the same problem with 2 or more TT3600 or TT3650CI hopefully the solution is to decrease the count of urb's (USB request block). When I change in line 1058 of file pctv452e.c from ".count = 7;" to ".count = 4" it works for me. Hopefully it helps other. Best regards, laasa. _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
