[ re-adding mailing list; CC'ing original submitter (not 100% sure whether address is correct though) ] Am Dienstag 11 März 2008 schrieb Guillaume Membré: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Christoph Pfister > > <christophpfister@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 2008/3/8, Guillaume Membré <guillaume.ml@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > Hello > > > > > > Attached is a scan file for the french cable operator "Numericable". > > > Hope this helps :) > > > > <snip> > > diff -r 3cde3460d120 util/scan/dvb-c/fr-noos-numericable > > --- a/util/scan/dvb-c/fr-noos-numericable Tue Mar 11 12:40:20 2008 > > +0100 +++ b/util/scan/dvb-c/fr-noos-numericable Tue Mar 11 12:41:03 > > 2008 +0100 @@ -1,41 +1,90 @@ > > # Cable en France > > # freq sr fec mod > > C 123000000 6875000 NONE QAM64 > > +C 123125000 6875000 NONE QAM64 > > C 131000000 6875000 NONE QAM64 > > +C 131125000 6875000 NONE QAM64 > > <snip> > > > > Nearly every entry is duplicated (two frequencies are too close to > > each other --> both "lead" to the same transponder ...). > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Guillaume > > > > Christoph > > Your are correct : there is two entry for each transponders but with > my satelco easy watch dvb-c, I'm not able to detect anything with > frequencies like 123000000 but with 123125000 it is ok. > > So what can we do ? There are four possible reasons for that behaviour: 1) the card of the original submitter can deal with larger frequency offsets than yours 2) the driver of your card / the card of the original submitter is/was broken 3) the provider uses slightly different channel parameters for different cities 4) the provider changed the channel parameters meanwhile (though - such a little change is quite unlikely) @Matthieu - can you please check whether for example 123125000 works for you? > Regards > Guillaume Christoph _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
