On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 20:45 +0100, Filippo Argiolas wrote: > Il giorno mer, 20/02/2008 alle 10.29 +0100, Filippo Argiolas ha scritto: > > > I don't know yet how this could be done and maybe it involves some work > > rewriting the ir stuff. So I think in the meanwhile my patch could be > > merged (if you think it's good) waiting for this work to be done. > > Hi all, > it's been a while since I've posted this patch. Looking at the whole > thread the overall impression is that it works properly. No one > complained about it causing any trouble. Many users tested it and > reported it works good. I've been using it during this time and it seems > fine to me. It also fixed the annoying bug that flooded syslog with > unknown key messages. > So what does it need to be merged? Is a post in this list the proper way > to ask for inclusion? I'm not familiar to mercurial so I've created the > patch as I would do with a svn with "hg diff", it something wrong with > it? Is there a better way to produce a patch for submission? > I've attached a new patch where I've removed the keymaps I've used for > testing since these are not complete and I doubt anyone could find them > useful. > Please let me know what you think about it, thanks! > Best regards, > Filippo, I have just read that: > The procedure is simple: after having it worked and tested, for its > inclusion, you'll need to send it to the DVB ML (also, to V4L ML, if hybrid). > The better is to c/c me on the e-mail you submit it, for me to be > aware of. After some days, if nobody complains, and if it looks ok, I'll commit. > > Cheers, > Mauro Maybe you will want to do it. Nico _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
