Hi, On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:23:02PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote: > Artem Makhutov wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 05:52:39PM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote: > >>Artem Makhutov wrote: > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 02:18:52AM +0400, Manu Abraham wrote: > >>>>Also, can you please do a benchmark in lock timings between changeset > >>>>7205 and 7200 ? > >>>Do you mean changeset 7200 or 7204 > >>yep. 7205 is head, but just a minor change. > > > >I did the benchmark betweet 7205 and 7204. > >The modules were loaded with no additional parameters. > > > >Tuning time in 7204: ~0.83 seconds (min 0.81191 sec ; max 2.428967 sec) > >Tuning time in 7205: ~0.26 seconds (min 0.24789 sec ; max 1.994216 sec) > > > Can you test the time between 7200 and 7204/7205. > (7201 - 7204 contains an optimization, compared to 7200 and hence > the need to check the results. So need to exclude 7201 and 7204) Ok, I got it. I was in the believe that the tuning will only work ~50 percent successfull with rev 7200...) Here are the results of the benchmarks with rev 7200: A tune needs ~1 second. Min: 0.829529 ; Max: 3.074599 The log file is available at: http://www.makhutov.org/downloads/dvb/logs/7200.log.gz So your optimizations works great ;) Regards, Artem -- Artem Makhutov Unterort Str. 36 D-65760 Eschborn _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
