Re: never do symbol_put(tunerfoo_attach);

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:> Em Sex, 2007-11-16 às 18:37 -0500, mkrufky@xxxxxxxxxxx escreveu:>   >> Michel Ludwig wrote:>>     >>> Hi Mike,>>>>>> On Fri 16 Nov 2007, mkrufky@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:>>>   >>>       >>>> Mauro and Michel,>>>>>>>> This changeset is wrong:>>>>>>>> http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mchehab/tm6000/rev/79f9210425e2>>>>>>>> You should not " symbol_put(xc3028_attach); " , because you don'talways>>>> know that we're dealing with that tuner.>>>>     >>>>         >>> We know that because it's the only tuner that I've ever seen on tm6000 >>> devices :-)>>>   >>>       >> We like to make linuxtv drivers modular and forward compatible.  There >> _are_ devices out there that use other tuners, and if you hardcode >> xc3028 into this driver, it prevents future developers from adding >> support for other devices without having to change existing code.>>     >>> But anyway, how would dvb_frontend_detach(fe) release the xc3028_attach >>> symbol, which is requested by dvb_attach?>>>       >> The answer is self-explanatory.  Take a look at the other drivers, and >> take a look at dvb_frontend_detach.   (dvb_frontend.c , lines 1204 thru >> 1221)>>>> Better to use the established methods, and have uniform codingstyle >> across the tree -- don't reinvent the wheel ;-)>>     >> Mike, there are some that calls symbol_put directly, like dst.>   >> -Mike>>     DST is a special case -- it is an ASIC.  Certain hacks were done there to make it "look" like a frontend, but it is not.  Manu has explained this repeatedly.
-Mike


_______________________________________________linux-dvb mailing listlinux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux