On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 19:22:37 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 19:11:54 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:06:09 +0300, Tomi Orava wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > with my Cinergy T^2 there is a problem when I unplug the device. Top shows > > > > that khubd uses 100% CPU. My system uses Kernel 2.6.21.1 + latest v4l-dvb > > > > modules from <http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb>. With the original kernel > > > > modules there is no problem. > > > > > > > > How can I help to fix the problem? > > > > > > Unfortunately I don't have a fix for you, but in case you would be > > > interested to try a modified version of that driver, here is the patch. > > > The patch modifies the existing Cinergy T^2 driver to fit into dvb-usb > > > framework, although it is very experimental in nature (seems to work > > > quite ok, although no remote controller handling for now). > > > > > > I'm very interested to hear if it works/doesn't work for you. > > > The patch introduces an alternative driver menu option (in addition to > > > existing one) for cinergy T2 and the module name is dvb-usb-cinergyT2 > > > instead. > > > > > > Patch the diff against latest HG source tree. > > > > Hi, > > > > I tried to use the patch, but it seems to be broken here: > > > > $ patch -p1 < ../dvb-usb-cinergyT2.diff > > patching file linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/Kconfig > > patching file linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/Makefile > > patching file linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/cinergyT2-core.c > > patching file linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/cinergyT2-fe.c > > patching file linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/cinergyT2-remote.c > > patching file linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/cinergyT2.h > > patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line > > patch: **** malformed patch at line 1006: > > > > $ md5sum ../dvb-usb-cinergyT2.diff > > c688e3a87fe8fb0c1ef582578bcd3ce1 ../dvb-usb-cinergyT2.diff > > > > Is my mailbox broken? Where can I get a working version of the driver? > > Scratch that. I found the diff in a mailing list archive, and it has > the same problem, and the same md5sum. It looks like the patch in my > system is fishy. Is there another "version" of the patch that I could > try? Oh well, a newline was missing at the end. Now patching succeeds. Regards, Tino _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
