On 8/17/07, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Allthough this patch is still in the queue of required patches. I > > would still like to see that one upstream since it would be required > > by a few drivers for checking if they're really idle. > > I agree with Obi, Mkrufky and Christoph. It seems to be better to handle > lock control inside your driver. > Please analyze mails I sent and review the code afterwards please answer this thread again. There are 2 issues one if the filehandle is closed the DVB thread is sometimes still spinning in the background (eg. if someone runs the DVB scan application) (I'm writing this the 3rd time now!). The other one that Steve's patch immediatelly unlocks the "bridge" after the node is closed. For me this issue is still open. Markus _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
