Michael Krufky schrieb: > e9hack wrote: >> >> I didn't see the ranges from the tuner, because the dvb-c drivers don't use the pll framework. They >> have very simple tuning functions only. We should use both values. One part may be more restrictive >> than the other one. > > FYI, I never mentioned "pll framework" Sorry, for my incorrect wording.. > IMHO, if there is a separate tuner used in conjunction to the demod, it is > better to factor out the tuner to a separate dvb_frontend style module, rather > than leaving it hardcoded within the demod driver. This may result in a benefit > of removal of duplicated code, in cases where multiple demods are using the same > tuner. I don't know if this is the case in your situation, but it is the case > with many others. I think, this is the best way. Currently, I'm missing something in the tuner modules (and I didn't ask for it). It isn't possible to wait for getting the pll lock. The tuning function of the TT-C2300 does wait. It isn't possible to switch the time constant of the loop filter after getting the lock. Usually, it is recommended for any pll chips. - Hartmut _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
