On 8/4/07, Janne Grunau <janne-dvb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Saturday 04 August 2007 00:02:29 Manu Abraham wrote: > > > > Do we really want to have adapter numbers in DVB bridge drivers ? > > IMHO, it doesn't look pleasing to have that. > > I think it's worthwhile to have it. > > > > Is there any other possible better alternatives ? > > Something similiar is possible with udev rules but I wouldn't say that > it is a better alternative. Why ? If you can achieve the same without any code change, doesn't that look better ? > > If it is that > > absolute a necessity, can we hide the ugliness in dvb-core at least ? > > I'm not really sure what you mean exactly. If you want to avoid changes > in the bridge drivers I don't see a way to archieve that. If you want > the changes as small as possible look at the final patch. That one looks better than your first patch. (Although i hate having a MAX limit defined) I meant adding a module parameter to each module, which was a bit, .. I don't know how come others said that they liked the first one very much. > One line for > the module parameter and the added parameter for the register function. > I don't think it can be done with less changes. True. _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
