Hi, Am Dienstag, 24. Juli 2007 12:37 schrieb Marvin Hankley: > Hi! > > > Is that really needed? NIT linking exists which allows the scan apps to > > find the other transponders (ideally from a single initial tuning entry). > > Of course some providers manage to mess stuff up so that you need more > > (or all) entries to get the full channel list. So to change anything I > > need some results from testing ... > > From my initial testing, the original file was not enabling scan to > find all the present transponders. Ok ... > So, I made the complete list. I > know scan is capable of detecting other transponders from a smaller > number but do we lose anything from having a more complete list than > is strictly necessary? The problem arises when some of them become invalid because you get timeouts then. It's also a bit more difficult to maintain them (but that's the case anyway ;) - hmm, will see and think a bit about this ... the main issue remains: where to get an authoritative source of information? > Cheers, > Marv Christoph _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
