2007/6/13, Zoilo Gomez <zoilo@xxxxxxxxx>: >Great! > >(out of curiosity:) Why doesn't the operator of Hotbird not take care of >updating the links? Is this normal? I don't know why this happens - on the other hand I didn't make any offical step (read: writing a mail to them or so; maybe I'm a bit pessimistic) ... >Z. Christoph >Christoph Pfister wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After the nit linking was broken and the scan file was updated I recognised >> that still some transponders are missing. I did some investigation over here >> and the attached file finds every transponder known to me. >> The first line is kept for historical reasons; the second one finds almost >> every channel and the 5 others are transponders which aren't linked from any >> other place (isn't that _nice_). Compared to the current situation about 9 >> additional transponders are found with this file. >> >> Any objections against committing it? >> >> Christoph >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> # EUTELSAT SkyPlex, Hotbird 13E >> # freq pol sr fec >> S 12539000 H 27500000 3/4 >> S 10892000 H 27500000 3/4 >> S 10853000 H 27500000 3/4 >> S 10992000 V 27500000 2/3 >> S 11334000 H 27500000 2/3 >> S 11373000 H 27500000 2/3 >> S 12460000 V 27500000 3/4 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb