On 6/1/07, Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@xxxxxx> wrote: > Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2007 20:13 schrieben Sie: > > Uwe Bugla wrote: > > > In current kernel 2.6.22-rc3 the frontend module dvb-pll.c is attached > as > > > a generic standard for all bt8xx-based DVB cards. This is no good > > > solution. > > > > > > Fact is: > > > The only bt8xx-based card taking advantage of that pll library is the > > > DViCO FusionHDTV Lite 5. All other bt8xx-based DVB cards do not take any > > > advantage of this pll library. > > > > > > The following patch corrects this problem without breaking any card > > > support. For further SOBs I do appreciate the relevant persons Cced. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@xxxxxx> > > > > NACK. > > > > This hack is unacceptable. Uwe, Please have patience > > In fact I had enough patience, for a couple of months now. > Even if you do not like it, it is a functionable compromise solution for > now. > > There is no technical reason to nack it at all. If there is one, then it's > either a personal issue or a matter of design. > The fact that you reacted so quickly prefares option 1 (i. e. personal > issue). > > And the tactical background of telling some other person to wait (or to be > patient) without offering an adequate time window for the WHEN is a gesture > of humiliation (I know that gesture already very well from Manu, and I do > not > like it at all). > > Above that you were not the only one I was asking for a SOB. I only wanted > to > try fair play (i. e. not overstepping anybody). > Mike is right this patch isn't acceptable because it can done a better way, you might ask Trent to fix it I sent you a better way but I don't even have the device and cannot do any testing. As it is I also don't accept it that way. Markus _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
