Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 17.05.2007, 17:56 +0200 schrieb hermann pitton: > Am Montag, den 14.05.2007, 13:39 -0700 schrieb Trent Piepho: > > On Mon, 14 May 2007, Markus Rechberger wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I exported the patches of my v4l-dvb-experimental repository against > > > the current v4l-dvb repository on linuxtv.org. > > > > > > The single patchfiles are available on mcentral.de > > > http://mcentral.de/~mrec/patches/v4l-dvb/ > > [93 patches] > > actually 78 and on missing 16 i stopped, seeing your clashes already. > > > It's really hard for anyone to make sense of a patch bomb like this. > > There's just too many changes, and none of the patches even have comments > > longer than one line. > > > > The organization of the patches is really hard to follow too. For example, > > patch 19 adds a NULL pointer check to tuner-core (why is this necessary?) > > and then also adds two register names names to the dvb zl10353 driver. > > Those changes have nothing to do with each other. It's patch 20 that > > actually adds the code to zl10353 that uses the new registers, and it even > > changes the names used in patch 19. > > > > Trent, any chance to get it up to current level for testing and to make > next time less hard? I'm willing to waste time (and devices) on it. > They at least all apply and testing is possible to give feedback! I really hope there is a fair and widely accepted solution soon for Markus, XCeive support is a highly relevant global issue. Thanks, Hermann _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
