-------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:00:44 +0200 Von: "Markus Rechberger" <mrechberger@xxxxxxxxx> An: "Simon Arlott" <simon@xxxxxxxxxxx> CC: Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@xxxxxxxxx>, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, helge.hafting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical points about ...) > On 5/1/07, Simon Arlott <simon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote: > > > Trent Piepho wrote another patch for it, it just completes Uwe's patch > > > in the end. > > > From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else > > > has a problem with it please state out the reason. > > > > I have no problem with the patch since it has nothing to do with my DVB > > card but you're only encouraging Uwe to be abusive since it seems to > > help get him what he wants: > > > > On 01/05/07 00:05, Uwe Bugla wrote: > > > Piepho, you are a devil, and your links do not work at all! > > > Uwe > > > > On 01/05/07 00:40, Uwe Bugla wrote: > > > Go to hell, Manuel Abraham, and do not return at all to absolutely no > > thinkable condition at all, and never come back to this place once more > > again > > > Just goto hell, you goddamn deeply asocial miserable sonofabitch!! > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > On 4/30/07, Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> it's enough, I told him that I'll look at it and try to get some > other > > >> people involved if it really breaks something it should get stated > > >> out; and I'll refuse any further help if he starts to write any more > > >> abusive mail. > > > > It's not working. Patches should still be applied on the basis of what > > they do and how, not why they were made, of course. > > this patch was written by Trent, and it seems like he already had that > idea earlier too. > > I really don't care if that patch goes in or not in the end, there's > just no need to flame around for it. > > The only reason I see is that it's not needed to link it statically > against the bt878 module and there isn't even much work to do. > Uwe's Makefile patch worked as expected, but it wasn't clean/complete > enough that was a reason to not include it. > Now with Trent's patch I don't see that as a valid argument against it > anymore. > And the email from Manu claiming that it generates alot work (which is > btw. 2 years old) doesn't seem to be valid either. > > Markus Thank you, Markus - you are a real fine and straight chap. You should be team leader of this community. BTW: Are my latest attempts sent to you already involved in the latest development state (Read: Is dvb-pll.c deselectable now without breaking support for lgdt330)? I simply stumbled over that lgdt330 binding in module dvb-bt8xx.c, line 641 or so. Anything else I resolved at least from my personal side. A thousands of thanks to you and Trent - well done! > > _______________________________________________ > linux-dvb mailing list > linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb -- "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
