Hi, Mauro Le mardi 17 avril 2007 13:22, Mauro Borghi a écrit : > For example the freq allocation plan for Italy is as follows: > > # ch center-f bw > chD 177500000 7MHz > chE 186000000 7MHz > chF 194500000 7MHz > chG 203500000 7MHz > chH 212500000 7MHz > chH1 219500000 7MHz > chH2 226500000 7MHz > # (gap between VHF and UHF channels) > ch21 474000000 8MHz > ch22 482000000 8MHz > ch23 490000000 8MHz > ch24 498000000 8MHz > ch25 506000000 8MHz > # ... (add rows from ch26 to ch65) ... > ch66 834000000 8MHz > ch67 842000000 8MHz > ch68 850000000 8MHz > > I do not actually know if and how much the allocation plans differ for > other countries - but I suspect there are some differences: some might > not use 7MHz channels, some might not use VHF freqs, some countries > might have slightly different center frequencies for some channels. > Probably Europe is quite harmonized now... > > The allocation plan for Italy can be easily translated into a scan file > which is suitable for any location in Italy. I agree it's not optimized, > but you are sure you're going to get all available muxes, even during > years when dvb-t is still being deployed - with analog switch-off yet to > come. IMHO, such a plan should rather be seen as a recommandation, but will be adapted to local constrains, so i doubt a "Country template scan file" would be reliable. ATM, kaffeine autoscan does scan 8MHz bandwidth from 402 to 898 and it takes about 2.5 minutes (with the default 1500ms tuning timeout), so even with a reliable specific country scan i'm not sure it would reduce scan time so much. -- Christophe Thommeret _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
