Hi, Am Freitag, 13. April 2007 13:41 schrieb Dirk Ritter: > Hello Christoph, hello Maik! > > First off - thank you very much for your > time and efforts. This is much appreciated. <snip> > However, I went to the trouble to verify > against a scan, run, using only one single > initial frequency, letting "scan" find out > all the others itself. This scan did back > up the listing I made and external data > sources which I used earlier - including > the QAM64/256 settings that did yield > disagreement. So actual usage seems to > match my earlier configuration precisely > and all changes I made based on Maik's sources > for verification did just result in errors > for me. <snip> You can omit those frequencies scan is able to find by analyzing the stream. This results in a smaller file (and less tuning errors in case transponders are removed), but still all channels are available. Do I understand you correctly and for example the following scan file would still find the complete set of channels? C 113000000 6900000 NONE QAM64 C 418000000 6900000 NONE QAM256 C 466000000 6900000 NONE QAM64 If yes, I'll include those (as there's no sense in having more initial tuning settings than needed; three transponders just seem a good number to me if any of them becomes invalid). If no, I'll complete them with the necessary entries ... Christoph _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
