Re: [BUG] flexcop lockdep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Borgi2008 wrote:
Hello,

i've created a bugfixes. Hope it could helps you.

Hendrik Borghorst



Actually, looking at the code I cannot figure out why there has to be a
spinlock in the first place.

The lock is only taken in the interrupt handler which already runs in
atomic context so there is no use in making the handler protected by a
spinlock. Am I missing something here?

I think the spinlock is unnecessary and should be removed entirely.


--
Antti Seppälä

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux