Re: [PATCH] Multi protocol support (stage #1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/13/06, Yeasah Pell wrote:
Ok, sorry about the confusion. I think I now see where I got lost in
your original response. If I'm now understanding you correctly, then I
would answer Alan's original question:

> Alan Nisota wrote:
> ...
>> Specifically, if the API is version 3.2, does that mean that all cards
>> can be accessed with the new DVBFE ioctls (which would make things
>> relatively nice, as an app needs to support only one or the other as
>> defined at compile-time), or does each driver need to be ported to use
>> the new API, in which case there needs to be some way to designate
>> which cards support the new drivers?
>

With simply "all cards will be accessible through the new DVBFE ioctls."
Right?
This is the answer I would prefer.  It greatly simplifies the coding
if we can determine at compile time which API to use rather than
needing to do so on the fly during execution.

Alan

_______________________________________________

linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux