Re: [PATCH] Multi protocol support (stage #1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
Apart from the S2 stuff (haven't looked at it in this
version of the patch), there are still a couple of
things which I don't like. Most of them I pointed
out earlier already, but to summaryize and give
some additional explanation:

- too much unnecessary capabilites stuff; I receive a private
  mail from Trent and answered:

> See, the DVB Wiki lists a number of applications. You can check them
  > all, not one of then looks at fe_caps_t. Why should they?
  > If fe_type_t says it's e.g. a DVB-T frontend, that's all the
  > application needs to know.
>

I am not very interested in the private discussion what you had with Trent. but,

But the practicality is that, these are needed for "multistandard tuners" as i explained earlier. I did explain my POV on this "publicly". Is it that my English is bad that it is hard to understand .. ?

I did not see any technical discussion as to which it proves otherwise, that it is indeed unnecessary.


Manu


_______________________________________________

linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux