On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 02:58 +0400, Manu Abraham wrote: > Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 April 2006 23:21, Rusty Scott wrote: > > > >> So can someone give me a quick decision on what I should do? Should I > >> put that code into dvb-core.c or make a new dvb_core_math.c? > >> > > > > I would say put it in dvb_core_math.c, but link it into the dvb-core.ko > > module. > > > > > > > what about dvb_math.c ? But we will need a log function which has a > better precision for tuning algorithm. Christoph Pfister volunteered to > do one for the stb0899. If we have a common one which is quite precise > would be nice. > > He sent me a preview, i think it needed a bit more tuning up, he said he > got an accuracy of 0.054% > WTF? I'm asking what I should do with my patch so I can get this code fixed, placed in a common place, and use it in another module. If someone wants to then patch that with a more accurate ilog2 and write a conversion to i10log10 or whatever I'm fine with that too. When I'm asking the question what should I do, I'm not really looking for the response "this is what someone else is doing that might be tangentially related to what you have submitted." Give me some direction here. dvb_math or dvb_core_math? linked into dvb_core.ko? Thanks, Rusty _______________________________________________ linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb