Re: [PATCH] Moving ALPS BSRV2 tuner handling code to separate file.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Perceval Anichini wrote:
Well, that's why I think 'tuner-' is indeed a quite reductive prefix ...

Maybe we shall have a single file by _chip_ then ???

For instance : lnb-disecq/lnbp21.h
	lnb-disecq/lnbp13.h

"sec/" might sound better, since who knows what might come later on ..

	tuners/bsbe1.h
	tuners/bsrv2.h
	demod/stv0299.h
	demod/...

And then a frontend is the sum of a lnbp chip, a demod, a tuner :
exactly as in the DVB API documentation... ?

Sounds nice. The only problem is to get people to agree on such a huge change, eventhough cosmetic. It looks quite meaningful, atleast to myself.

What about silicon tuners ? They have sec/(tuner)rf stages + pll /demod everything in one single chip. Then there are split ones, rf stage + pll in one chip, demod + sec in another


Manu


_______________________________________________

linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux