On 3/24/06, Michael Krufky <mkrufky@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Luis Ochoa wrote: > > On 3/24/06, Michael Krufky <mkrufky@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Luis Ochoa wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, as the subject says. Any ideas? > >>> Thanks! > >> The mercurial tree will not be compatible with your non-standard > >> kernel.... Your kernel is reporting itself as a 2.6.15 kernel, but it > >> contains semaphore to mutex conversions backported from 2.6.16 > >> > >> either: > >> > >> a) grab a vanilla kernel > >> > >> or b) my famous new quote: > >> > >> -EOUTOFLUCK > >> > > Thank you Michael. > > So if I understand correctly, latest mercurial is compat with 2.6.15 > > but _not_ with 2.6.16 ? (at least not yet) > > > The mercurial tree is compatable with 2.6.15, 2.6.16, and all other > VANILLA kernels since 2.6.10, maybe even earlier..... > > The problem is that you are using a kernel that has 2.6.16 code in it, > but it is reporting that it is 2.6.15. This causes a failure in our > kernel version tests, and this is the reason why build fails for you. > > You are not using a VANILLA kernel. > > Now, some non-vanilla kernels will work... but this one doesnt because > of the situation described above. > > HTH, > > -- > Michael Krufky Thanks. Found the problem. Apparently there are some probs with that kernel that shipped with FC5. Whoever is on the same boat, and want to try out a pre-compiled kernel that works with latest v4l-dvb, try here: http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/FC5/ _______________________________________________ linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
