Hi, On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Laurence Abbott wrote: > With an older version of 'scan', I had to extend the filter timeout or > it would only return the channels on the last-tuned multiplex: I think > this just worked when I tried it with a CVS version of 'scan'. Are you using the box on a USB1.1 port? When running on a USB1.1 port the pid filter is activate, ie. eg. when scanning it can take a while until a buffer is filled to be returned to the host-PC. > I'm suspicious that this is the problem that I have with vdr: it doesn't > wait for long enough to tune. vdr finds it as a DVB device and tries to > use it but I never get a video stream from it from vdr! I also have a > PCI Nova-T in the same system and that works fine, so I know that the > vdr setup works (at least with that card!). I use the box for almost one year now daily with VDR but on a USB2.0 port. > Is anyone using one of these USB2 devices successfully with vdr? Or have > they changed something in the latest revision of the device which breaks > something? I have tried drivers from 2.6.12.5 and 2.6.14 kernels but > they both give the same result. > > I have yet to try CVS drivers because I have to hack the drivers to get > the remote on my PCI Nova-T to work properly, unless that has changed > recently! Has anyone got the remote on the USB2 device to work? A quick > test with evtest gave me a keymapping but nothing appeared when I > pressed buttons (apart from the LED flashing!). I'm also using the remote daily. It is a bit clumsy, but it works. > This must be so close to working...do I need to hack vdr to extend a > timeout for this to work? I don't think so. Is it also a problem when you want to watch a channel which from a channels.conf which was created by the PCI card? If so, could you run femon while VDR is working with the Box and see if the card has a lock. best regards, Patrick. -- Mail: patrick.boettcher@xxxxxxx WWW: http://www.wi-bw.tfh-wildau.de/~pboettch/