Andrew de Quincey wrote: >Yup thats the only way really. I'd suggest using the NIT once you've found >one, but I've found that is wrong on some transmitters :( > > > Using the NIT is a problem for other reasons. Where I am we see too transmitters and can tune to two sets of transponders. I choose been the transponders based on signal/noise. It so happends that the first transponder to respond is the weaker. Using its NIT as a short cut will prevent finding the strong tranmitter. I do use the corrections that the NIT provides, but always try every valid transponder. Barry