On Monday 21 Nov 2005 13:06, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > These are all good points. I'm going to start prototyping now - it'll be > > obvious during that which API calls are the best all round from an API > > and an implementation point of view. > > Have you had a look at the data sheet of demodulators which > support scanning in firmware, like the mt352 and mt312? > (Are there others?) > > I believe the mt3xx data sheets are available from the Zarlink website. > > I wanted to check them myself and comment on your API proposal, but > again failed to find the time to do so. :-( yeah - I did. That was why I agreed with having frequency range scanning in the kernel since the mt352 can do that entirely in hardware.
