> Is the patch below what you meant? If yes, can you try a smaller
> msleep, maybe 15 msecs?
15ms were to little but 30ms worked.
Still one little question remains: Why does that work?
And what about other hardware with cx24110?
Here's my patch against linux 2.6.12 (seems to be identical to CVS):
--- drivers/media/dvb/frontends/cx24110.c.orig 2005-07-11 22:26:25.000000000
+0200
+++ drivers/media/dvb/frontends/cx24110.c 2005-07-24 23:55:12.000000000
+0200
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@
return -EINVAL;
rv = cx24110_readreg(state, 0x77);
- cx24110_writereg(state, 0x77, rv|0x04);
+ cx24110_writereg(state, 0x77, rv | 0x04);
rv = cx24110_readreg(state, 0x76);
cx24110_writereg(state, 0x76, ((rv & 0x90) | 0x40 | bit));
@@ -418,7 +418,8 @@
cx24110_writereg(state, 0x79 + i, cmd->msg[i]);
rv = cx24110_readreg(state, 0x77);
- cx24110_writereg(state, 0x77, rv|0x04);
+ cx24110_writereg(state, 0x77, rv & ~0x04);
+ msleep(30);
rv = cx24110_readreg(state, 0x76);
Adam
