Kenneth Aafl?y wrote: > l?rdag 23. juli 2005, 22:59, skrev Kenneth Aafl?y: > > l?rdag 23. juli 2005, 09:45, skrev Dominik Strasser: > > > typedef enum fe_sec_voltage { > > > - SEC_VOLTAGE_13, > > > - SEC_VOLTAGE_18, > > > - SEC_VOLTAGE_OFF > > > + SEC_VOLTAGE_13 = 0, /* 13V DVB-S vertical */ > > > + SEC_VOLTAGE_18 = 1, /* 18V DVB-S horizontal */ > > > + SEC_VOLTAGE_OFF = 2, /* 0V DVB-S / -T standby / passive antenna */ > > > + SEC_VOLTAGE_5 = 3, /* 5V DVB-T active antenna */ > > > + SEC_VOLTAGE_12 = 4 /* 12V DVB-S DiSEqC */ > > > + VOLTAGE_13 = 0, /* 13V DVB-S vertical */ > > > + VOLTAGE_18 = 1, /* 18V DVB-S horizontal */ > > > + VOLTAGE_OFF = 2, /* 0V DVB-S / -T standby / passive antenna */ > > > + VOLTAGE_5 = 3, /* 5V DVB-T active antenna */ > > > + VOLTAGE_12 = 4 /* 12V DVB-S DiSEqC */ > > > } fe_sec_voltage_t; > > > + > > > + typedef fe_sec_voltage_t fr_voltage_t; > > > > I love this, except for the namespace issues, make it be prefixed > > by FE_/DVB_ instead. I think I like the original version better, because it makes the minimal change and keeps confusion at a minimum. Johannes