Ludwig Nussel wrote: > Johannes Stezenbach wrote: >>What I don't like about automake (or rather autoconf) is that >>./configure takes longer to run that the actual build of all >>in dvb-apps. I am somewhat familiar with autofoo, and I think >>that most of what autoconf does is pretty useless for >>Linux-only software. > Sure but especially the automatic build deps generation and "make > distcheck" are worth it nevertheless IMHO. I vote for autotools, at least as an option, too, as it eases up cross compiling sooo much. But I agree that it might be a bit overkill. What's about a lightweighted Makefile, without install/crosscompiling support, and a full-featured autotools version? Felix
