[linux-dvb] Problems with ca_zap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> Manu Abraham wrote:
>>Allan Stirling wrote:
>>>      p_program_descriptor->program_number =
>>>              ((p_program_descriptor->program_number | buf[pos + 0]) << 8) | buf[pos + 1];
>>>
>>>Doesn't look quite right. Why do we care what the program_number is 
>>>before it's been parsed?
>>Hmm, that is required because buf is 8 bits. All what i do is, get buf 
>>into program_number and shift program_number to the left by 8.
>>
>>>If I change this to
>>>
>>>      p_program_descriptor->program_number =
>>>              ( buf[pos + 0] << 8) | buf[pos + 1];
>>>
>>This would be wrong however, since if you left shift an 8 bit buffer by 
>>8 all you will get is 0.
>>
>>The problem would be solved, if program_number is initialized to 0 just 
>>before reading in from the buffer.
> 
> It still would be hard to read. How about:
> 
>        p_program_descriptor->program_number =
>                ((uint16_t) buf[pos] << 8) | buf[pos + 1];
> 

buf is uint8_t *buf

so shifting 8 bits left would make buf[pos] = 0 in all eventualities 
since uint8_t is 8 bits, and just a cast to uint16_t would help there ?


or am i wrong ?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux